Law Tort Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Law Tort - Case Study Example Keown also suffered from changes in the brain that led him to be convicted of several sexual offences later in his life. The claimant stated that as the premises had no suggestion that the fire escape was fragile, the claimant suffered his injuries because of the poor state of the premises. The NHS Trust which owned the property pointed out that Mr. Keown could be treated as a trespasser when he climbed the fire escape. Considering the danger of the state of the premises, the Trust was asked to pay a third of the damages to the claimant and the Trust appealed. The Trust placed their defence that the fire escape was not by itself dangerous and Justice Lewinson ruled that there was no reason of any danger due to the state of the premises and thus the claimant's appeal failed. The relevant cases which were cited in order to provide a judgment on this case include Donoghue v Folkestone Properties Ltd [2003] QB 1008, [2003] EWCA Civ 231 in which a young adult had dived into Folkestone harbour after midnight in mid-winter and struck his head on an underwater pile. The court ruled that there are some features within certain premises that are not inherently dangerous but which may tempt a person on the land to indulge in an activity which carries a risk of injury. In this case for Kweon, although the premises were not dangerous, his own actions seem to have caused him personal injury.

An article Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

An article - Essay Example Hence, living many to question his ethical claims about own lifestyle. The ethical question that arises is why does he claim that his life is simple yet own lifestyle depicts otherwise? The worst criticism though emerges after his return from England characterized by lavish travel style funded by special interest groups and non-profit organizations that he himself has instituted. His perceived ethical standards further betray own character, when he results to opening up corruption opportunities which he himself vowed to end. From the time he assumed office, he has been at loggerheads with public employees over wages. This raises question as to his ability to deliver earlier made promises of well-censored of an ethical rule. He has turned his regime as that full of secrets leaving many to question even his integrity as an honest man. Some people contend he is not the first to give such ethical speeches when contesting for an office, thus â€Å"so can he be an exemption?† They do all this by criticizing the current office and when they are in the same spot maintain similar operations. He further go against his ethical stands after promising to bring a legislation to bar public office holders to work in two jobs and end the conflict of interest but then the law never comes to be. This really downgrades his willingness to end the malpractice and end unlawful party donations. His critiques even argue that he showed little interest for the bill to pass and that is why he has done nothing about the bill even if he could do something. There are many ethical violations exhibited by Christie especially when he denied public information yet claimed accountability would characterize his leadership. This leaves many wondering of how a government can be accountable when they do not allow people to evaluate and score them. His tenure is a characterization of numerous lawsuits with a lot of